Blog Archives
Introduction
Most people weigh all of their decisions against their wallet. This economy hasn’t done anything to change that and in fact it has strengthened the practice. So when I talk to customers about buying eco-friendly products, I had better have some monetary reasons in my discussion points. The argument; “It is the right thing to do” or “We need to save the rain forests and polar bears” may be a valid rationalization but it often will not wash when people are concerned about their “bottom line”.
The two strongest reasons to buy “green” that I talk about in my store are the health of the home environment and the sustainability aspect of “green” which saves the purchaser money over the long term.
There are consumers that are either chemically sensitive or are concerned about the amount of chemicals that are in our environment and being absorbed by our bodies. They have heard enough on the news to be fearful. It is my job to do research on the products I carry. It is my commitment to my customers and my responsibility.
The sustainability issue is a monetarily practical issue but it also touches a larger pollution concern. If you buy the bargain sofa for $500 it will be easy on your budget now. The down side is that it won’t last more that five years and will need to be replaced. So figure that in the minimum 20 years it takes to raise a family you will replace that sofa four times. With normal inflation those sofas will probably not all be $500 so the total replacement costs of having a sofa is likely to at least be $2700. The pollution factors in with what you do with those four sofas when you replace them. Can they be recycled to a charity or a person in need or are they thrown away into a landfill and are deteriorating into the ground water?
The thread of these blog pieces is to explore how intertwined our desires to go “eco” and our monetary concerns balance with each other at all different levels. Join the discussion.